Do you have a "Winter Backpack"

I may be moving in that direction.  I don’t think I need anywhere near the weight capacity or volume mentioned above (“winter” may be different for me here in the southeast- typically not going anywhere below 0F), but I have found that many of the current ultralight packs are quite narrow (6″ wide seems to be something of a standard).  This works alright for summer, and gives you a nice slender looking pack, but trying to fit winter sleeping bags and insulation in them is almost impossible without ditching stuffs sacks and just filling the shape of the pack.  So, I may end up getting a winter pack that is thicker and wider to help accommodate those shapes more easily and keep the load lower.

I use the exact same pack as Garrett in the winter. 4800 Unaweep.  Only difference is I use the day talon.  Nice extra storage for swapping layers, and items I want on the quick when winter camping.  Nice pack.

I use the Seek Outside Divide or HMG Southwest in the summer, depending on what I am carrying.

• My winter pack is Gossamer Gear Mariposa. This will be my second winter using it so far it has worked perfectly for me.. there it is packed and ready from a trip last winter … The one on left.

Have you ever thought …PULK SLED?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqah1c74KHY

Garrett, the Divide is considerably larger than the Catalyst. I was filling my Catalyst to the brim with my winter gear. I have quite a bit more space in the Divide. I wonder if I even need the space, although I did fill it to the brim when traveling on a bus and shoving all of my gear (including boots and clothes) inside. The front pocket is enormous too.

Divide vs Catalyst. It’s hard to entirely appreciate, but the front pocket on the Divide is enormous. During the last trip, I fit the HMG ultamid, 8 snow stakes, an avalanche shovel, and a large Tyvek groundcloth. I probably could have fit crampons in there as well, although it would be tight.

I just bit the bullet and ordered a Divide.  My current packs jump from 45 liters (Exped Lightning) to 90 liters (Stone Glacier hunting pack)- this should work well for winter trips where higher volume is needed, but generally not heavy and longer backpacking trips outside of winter

Have a trip planned for the following weekend, so should be able to get a good sense of it’s abilities :)

I have a cilo 40b that goes to about 60L but its too small for me for winter. I opined for a Divide but I think 73L is still too small. There is a cilo that goes to 80 but the cilo that goes to 90 has a zipper on the bottom that really intrigues me. Plus it still shrinks to 50L so it wont necessarily be too too big.
I dont know what to do man. My heart wants the Divide. My reason says get the 80L cilo. But my wife is like just get the 90 cause it will never be too small but it compresses well so it wont be too floppy either.
I love the way cilos carry everything but i really want the frame of the SOs
I should just go unaweep but for some reason they just dont strike my eye.

edit- For those with Unaweeps… how are they with attaching snow stuff like crampons and axes and pokey things?

Well my Divide arrived one day before a snowshoe trip I had planned; futzed a little adjusting the shoulder harness and loaded it up :)

It really carried nice, I think about 35 lbs at the start (that’s w/ 6.5 lbs of water and 4 lbs of snowshoes)

Plenty of room for a winter trip or long “summer” trip.  I like the mesh pocket on the back (front?)- very roomy, but it’s also the most robust mesh pocket I have ever seen.

The fabric looks pretty burly (I snagged it several times w/ no consequences) and pretty water resistant.

Anyways I think this going to fit the bill exactly as I had hoped.

I received my new SO Unaweep 4800 about the same time as Mike did. The backpack exceeded my expectations. I put only 20lbs in my ULA Circuit to compare and man… was there a difference. It carries just like my old Baltoro 65 did, except without all the heavy unnecessary padding and fabric. Seek Outside really did a good job at putting weight in only the areas that really needed it. It’s not as wide as I thought it would be, which was a delight. The ULA Catalyst felt much wider than the Unaweep did. In regards to volume, and to my surprise, the Unaweep did not have as much capacity internally as the Catalyst did.  I know this is different than Adam’s experience and photo above. The slant of the frame reduces the internal volume dramatically, especially when you compare it to the Catalyst. It can only be seen from the top looking down though. Plenty of space for me and my winter gear though.

SO Unaweep 4800 – 78L

ULA Catalyst – 75L